Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Journal on Firearms and Public Policy | Main | pro gun laws booming at state level »

Deacons for Defense

Posted by David Hardy · 6 April 2006 10:44 AM

Just got Prof. Lance Hill's book, "The Deacons for Defense" (U. N. Carolina press, 2004). I'd expected the usual sort of book, which I can read in a day or less -- I cover ground pretty quickly. Instead it took me half a day to get to p. 77, which leaves about 300 more to go. This is a VERY serious piece of historical scholarship, combining news storys and interviews of members and witnesses, and putting everything in a detailed context.

Prof. Hill's thesis (to the extent I can see from the first 77 pages) is that the Deacons and related groups played a role at least as important, and perhaps more important, than the non-violence protestors (which in the context of the difference, means "no violence even if attacked" protestors). He adds, BTW, that even those civil rights workers understood that it was "no violence if attacked while on duty" -- many had guns in their homes and understood that if attacked at home they were free to fire back,

The armed groups such as the Deacons served several purpose. First, they made it safer for the non-violent workers, by making it harder for the Klan to stage large attacks. In many towns, Klan attacks stopped the first time they picked on a Deacon and he fired back. As one Deacon put it, Klansmen were willing to kill but not willing to be killed. Second, their defensive tactics often forced law enforcement to protect the nonviolent demonstrators. Law enforcement would sit back so long as Klan v. civil rights consisted of attacks by the Klan. When it became a two-sided conflict, that was something that had to be prevented. Third, in an honor-based society, they earned respect that would not be accorded someone who allowed himself to be beaten or attacked.

The quotes are wonderful. "We were tired of singing 'We Shall Overcome.'" Klansmen "didn't mind killing, they just didn't want to die." And the history -- the group started as some WWII vets who formed a sort of police auxilliary, and were given pistols, badges and a squadcar by the local police chief. He'd hoped they'd become a sort of overseer, and he could use them to control local blacks. It didn't work out that way, but when they made it clear they would not enforce segregation laws they apparently earned enough respect to where they kept their status.

Here's an intriquing note from the Martin Luther King papers: at one point the good doctor was applying for a gun permit, and another civil rights worker was shocked to see "an arsenal" in his house.

· civil rights struggle

Leave a comment