Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Strange shooting range bill in AZ | Main | Brady Campaign »

He must have really POed someone....

Posted by David Hardy · 30 March 2006 09:10 AM

An Ass't US Attorney Attorney fails to give the defense exculpatory material (material suggesting the defendants might be innocent, whose disclosure is required) -- that's not news. The judge reverses convictions because the AUSA failed to disclose -- OK, minor news.

But the government indicts the AUSA and another official for conspiring to conceal the evidence from the defense -- no doubt at all that IS news. Never heard of that before. It's always been -- if a person conceals evidence from the prosecution, charge them with obstruction of justice -- if someone conceals it from the defense and gets caught, oh, sorry, here's the evidence, best of luck with it. More here.

Am I too cynical when I suspect the difference might be that this particular former AUSA dared to complain abot how the Department handled the case, and then filed a whistle-blower lawsuit, following which "He said he got a call last week from his high school that his records were subpoenaed by the Justice Department, as were his college transcripts. "My phone records, my computer, my e-mail, my files in my office. My secretary has been subpoenaed..."

As an old bureaucrat, I know that in the bureaucracy the one unforgivable sin is to embarass your own agency. (You can embarass other agencies at will, but not your own). That was illustrated when Waco revived in 1999. The independent counsel (whose staff was mostly Justice lawyers on detail, so much for independence) found lots of coverups, and wrote them off as mistakes, misjudgments, etc. The one person he prosecuted was the AUSA, Johnson, who had let Mike McNulty see the evidence and thus expose the matter. The others walked, but Johnson had to take a dive on a felony for failing to hand over a few pages of notes to a grand jury.

Leave a comment