Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« New York City cooking crime books? | Main | Uodate on Parker case »

Alito's dissents

Posted by David Hardy · 3 November 2005 02:40 PM

[via the Volokh Conspiracy] Ann Althouse has a commentary on a NY Times article on Alito's dissents. Another blogger, Cass Sunstein, argues that Alito's dissents are generally to the "right" of the rest of the panel (nevermind that in the legal world left and right are not terribly clear at times -- i.e., the medical marihuana case -- and even in the case of the First Amendment, campaign finance reform has much of the left enthralled and much of the right appalled).

Althouse points out that the article repeats Sunstein's conclusions, but also mentions that Alito dissented in four cases that the Supreme Court later took, and in three of the four ruled the same way as his dissent called for. Prof. Frank Cross of the Univ. of Texas, who runs a database on how the Supreme Court treats Circuit decisions, say those are the highest numbers in his database (not clear if that's the highest number of "dissents adopted out of cases taken" or the highest percentage of the same).

Leave a comment