Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« British crime stats in | Main | Nevada CCWs and background checks »

Miers gone; next pick?

Posted by David Hardy · 27 October 2005 11:15 AM

Gene Volokh has an excellent posting on who the President should nominate next, and why. Kozinski and van Alstyne are quite pro-Second Amendment, by the way.

I'd assume the current administration would find van Alstyne too generally liberal for their tastes, although his views are, I think, thoroughly principled and rational. He calls them as he sees them, and not along partisan lines. Kozinski would be just great, altho his libertarian streak may also turn off the decisionmakers. As the good Prof. notes, any would be great additions to the Court, which cannot be said of a certain prior nominee.

Oh, please, not Gonzales! Not that I have much against him, but I hate to see someone making the same mistake twice. I don't care how much the Prez knows and likes a person, he should be able to see that the Court requires someone with serious capabilities -- it's not just another political appointment.

· contemporary issues