Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Nationwide concealed carry for LEOS | Main | Non-gun killer »

Ed Suter on medical costs of gunshot injuries

Posted by David Hardy · 18 May 2005 01:28 PM

Some years ago the antis (led in part by the Joyce Fdn) created the approach of treating GSW as a medical issue, which had some PR benefits to their cause. Dr. Edgar Suter, chair of Doctors for Integrity in Public Research, has taken the lead in responding.

Here is Suter's response to an article along these lines, published in the Amer. J. of Preventative Medicine. Suter points out:

1. The article claims that millions are spent treating gunshot wounds ... but the sums mentioned are only 0.064% of America's total medical costs.

2. This is a 60% decline since the last such study (1993) despite millions of new firearms entering the market annually.

3. No one would attempt a cost-benefit analysis without considering benefits (here, lives saved by defensive uses). Estimates are that medical negligence kills about 180,000 Americans annually, after all, but this hardly proves that medicine is useless or doctors should be avoided, since presumably many times that number are saved.

Some others of Dr. Edgar Suter's writings:

Guns In the Medical Literature: A Failure of Peer Review. An excellent and detailed article.

Violence in America, from the J. of Medical Assn't of Georgia.

· contemporary issues

Leave a comment