Novel theory of civil liability
Questions presented: (1) did the defendant have a duty not to shoot bottle rockets from his fundamental orifice while drinking at a frat party? (2) was the explosion of one of those which did not escape its launching apparatus the proximate cause of plaintiff's backward leap and fall? (3) is shooting bottle rockets out of one's posterior, while drunk, an ultrahazardous activity subject to strict liability?
This is cert-worthy from the very beginning.