« Canada's long gun registry fades out | Main | New 4th Amendment/qualified immunity case »
Miranda followup issue
Miranda v. Arizona generally requires that certain warnings be given before questioning a person who is in police custody. But how about a prisoner who is serving a sentence, and thus in custody 24/7, who taken into a room and questioned? Are Miranda warnings required then? Today, in Howes v. Fields, the US Supreme Court said nope.
Comments
This really reinforces the concept of "don't ever talk to the police."
Posted by: Scott at February 21, 2012 06:48 PM
Wow, even the liberals joined the opinion at least in part.
Posted by: Jim at February 21, 2012 08:47 PM
