Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
TheSurvivalistBlog.net
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Human end of the Chicago case | Main | Officer handcuffs victim »

Unity

Posted by David Hardy · 30 January 2010 09:10 PM

There are three ways to reach Second Amendment incorporation, at least two of which have present and powerful advocates. I can only say that I'm in correspondence with both, and they really wish there could be an end to to conflict. Bottom line: if the three routes to incorporation each got two votes, it's still a 6-3 and a win, the other side is left to ponder that "almost" only counts with horseshoes and hand grenades, and the winner who favors one route or another has some votes (for the first time in my lifetime) on which to build. They're going into the fight of their lives, no OUR lives, and don't need the distractions. We can all engage in internecine battles after oral argument, or better yet, the decision. For now they need to concentrate.

Bottom line: there is no bad way to win a case. There may be great ways and good ways, but there is no bad way. This reminds me of a W.C. Fields description of something else, but never mind. At least every conceivable angle has been covered, and any Justice who isn't 100% opposed to the right to arms or its incorporation has had a path laid out and supported, so take your pick.

· Chicago gun case

Comments

Great post, and LOL @ Fields reference. You always work blue, Hardy!

Posted by: Jack at January 30, 2010 09:33 PM

How about from the other side? With Heller in place, what kind of legal gymnastics will the opposition (and you know there will be some) have to go through to write a coherent dissent?

Posted by: anon at January 31, 2010 07:25 AM

Well said Dave Hardy!!!

Posted by: Coloradoan at January 31, 2010 09:05 PM

The NRA got the goods and Gura got the shaft, so of course the NRA is happy. That said, it's your place Dave, and I don't mean to be a pest, it's just that words like "high road" are, well, sorta out of place in this context given what happened. For my part, the best I can hope and pray for is the words "five to four majority in favor of the plaintiff."

Posted by: RKV at February 1, 2010 07:10 AM

David Hardy has knocked himself out on this one, and Heller, and has evidently been knocking himself out in service to this cause since about 1974. During which time he has worked constructively with and no doubt frequently kept the peace among a mob of well-intentioned but strikingly idiosyncratic and cranky legal activists. Now he's about to see the denouement, even as he has health problems. Give him your unqualified support and appreciation, which means no "buts" about who got slighted. Please. Bite your tongues. He's more than earned the peace and quiet he's requesting.

Posted by: jheath at February 1, 2010 09:32 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)