Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
TheSurvivalistBlog.net
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Strange column | Main | New article by Kopel and Cramer »

A strange firearm purchase....

Posted by David Hardy · 1 December 2009 01:08 PM

The FBI has announced its intent to purchase two 20mm rifles -- suppressed!''

Here's the piece they're buying.

The announcement is necessary because the contract will be single-source, simply awarded to a firm rather than put up for competitive bidding. The reason for single-sourcing here is that there IS only a single source of suppressed 20mm bolt action rifles.

Comments

At 59lbs to 130lbs for the rifle, I guess this will be the first crew served weapon fielded by the FBI?

...and Carolyn McCarthy thought a .50 BMG was heavy when she tried to pick one up (and couldn't) at a press conference. I can only imagine her reaction to this thing!

Posted by: GregM at December 1, 2009 01:30 PM

I read this yesterday and I still don't get it. What possible valid purpose does the FBI have for this sort of weapon? Since they're only buying two, I'm guessing it's for some sort of evaluation program, but still...

Posted by: Diogenes at December 1, 2009 02:15 PM

Clearly the FBI is concerned about killdozer mechanized militias.

Posted by: Eseell at December 1, 2009 02:17 PM

My answer may just be at the bottom of the document:

Contracting Office Address:
FBI Engineering Research Facility, FBI Academy
Quantico, Virginia 22135

Posted by: Diogenes at December 1, 2009 02:18 PM

Two possibilities: For the FBI exemplars museum, and for test and evaluation for attacking Americans.

Posted by: Flighterdoc at December 1, 2009 02:26 PM

Lon Horiuchi is getting his-self a 20mm!!

Posted by: Letalis Maximus, Esq. at December 1, 2009 02:59 PM

Gee, if Horiuchi had one of these at Ruby Ridge he could have eliminated all evidence that Vicki Weaver had ever existed.

This is a weapon of war, not law enforcement. We should be concerned about this. Do we need gun control for the FBI?

Posted by: Flash Gordon at December 1, 2009 03:18 PM

I'm waiting for the 30mm. The 20mm is way to small. If I have to pay a $200 tax I want the the big one.

Posted by: Dan Hamilton at December 1, 2009 03:18 PM

"And so it begins."

Posted by: Marcus at December 1, 2009 03:32 PM

Really its just one more logical step in the militarization of the police.

Our founders' disdain for a standing army is often mentioned; less often mentioned is that professional police forces in the modern sense were unknown to them. A standing, uniformed, professional police force with military training and equipment more closely resembles the "select militia" the founders warned against than it does the hue and cry or posse.

Which is not to say its possible to turn the clock back entirely, but the abandonmnet of Sir Robert Peel's principles of policing has profound implications on what we should expect from the police in future behavior.

Posted by: Dave R. at December 1, 2009 03:44 PM

And now, since the FBI has one, every two-star Mayberry department in the country will buy and use them....

Posted by: Flighterdoc at December 1, 2009 04:21 PM

I'm kinda tired of the militarization of the police - and even more tired of the Military being forced to act as Cops. It's in neither's best interest or pay-grade.

Posted by: DirtCrashr at December 1, 2009 05:09 PM

Didn't I see on some TV program where Barrett had built one as an experiment of sorts?

Posted by: Alan A. at December 2, 2009 07:52 AM

The answer is pretty simple, really. They've been calling around trying to find someone who would build one, so that they could figure out what happened to the helicopters that crashed on Henry Bowman's property...

Posted by: Bill Twist at December 2, 2009 12:30 PM

Undoubtedly the stated reason is for anti-material work during hostage scenarios, and these will go to the national HRT team. However, as we all know, what works for killing engine blocks also works for anti-personnel work.

Posted by: Mark at December 2, 2009 03:24 PM

Mark - wouldn't that be a bit of overKill?

Posted by: Rich at December 3, 2009 02:22 PM

Unprecedented expansion of federal wealth (taxes, power) closely followed by an unprecedented expansion of para-military power by the principle federal law enforcement agency.

It all makes perfect sense. There's more to protect and too much to lose. This is what it looks like when a government gets "too big to fail."

They are obviously expecting armed and armored assaults against federal facilities.

Posted by: Jim D. at December 3, 2009 09:26 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)