« Beyond belief.... | Main | Marcus Lutrell addressing NRA convention »
A Rifleman in No Man's Land
America's First Freedom, January, has my article "A Rifleman in No Man's Land." (It's not in the online edition). I'll post scans of some of the correspondence mentioned in it. The core of the article is that in the late 19th and early 20th centuries there was a fad of military anti-marksmanship, which NRA fought against. The theory was that most riflemen couldn't hit a target anyway (and there were proposals to remove the sights and replace them with a level, the officer calling out the proper elevation!). Marksmanship taught pride and independence, which were the ruination of good discipline.
In World War I, the standard British and French training was to rush home with the bayonet. If men stopped to shoot, they'd go prone, and the advance would stop. The one problem with this approach was that the attackers were butchered and the attack failed. Still this approach won over Sec. of War Newton Baker. American troops were trained in trench fighting with knife and grenade, not with rifles.
NRA's head, Col. William Libby, was a professor at Princeton when President Woodrow Wilson taught there, and they were good friends. General Pershing, sent to Europe to prepare for his troops' arrival, was a serious competitive shooter. The two lobbied President Wilson and Secretary Baker, and in the end won out.
This December 1916 letter from Col. Libby to the President asks for a personal meeting. It's also interesting to illustrate how NRA was then virtually a quasi-government agency. The NRA and the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice share one letterhead.
This letter from Secretary Baker announces that General Pershing has won him over to rifle skills. "This will confirm the opinion that Colonel Libbey expressed to you and, of course, completely upsets the view which I had expressed to you." He announces that soon "a large amount of practice ammunition will be in the hands of the soldiers, and suitable ranges provided for extensive practice." (Note the practice in governmental letters of putting the address at the bottom rather than top of the page).
President Wilson's response to the Secretary notes "It would tickle Colonel Libbey to death if I could show it to him, and it is very generous of you to send it to me."
So the NRA played a major role in WWI -- that of keeping American troops from being butchered. Not a bad historical niche.
· NRA
Comments
Chalk one up for Ambrose Burnside!
Historically, the policy choice between creating marksmen or worker-bees has profound implications. It is equivalent to distinguishing between self-acting citizens or peasants; the difference between artisans or laborers. The choice made reveals the role of the people as envisioned by the government.
I wrote about it here, among other places:
http://www.saf.org/journal/15/TheHighestPossibleGenerality.htm
Posted by: jnheath at December 28, 2009 11:04 AM
Individual marksman was one of the reasons the Longbow in England was so feared by others. Each of those men were practiced and with it could shoot through the armor of the Noblemen at a distance. Meant that the peasants had a advantage over those Noblemen finally.
Posted by: Rich at December 28, 2009 01:11 PM
People today do not understand how great a military officer Black Jack Pershing was. He was a nearly dead old man by WWII, but in Mexico, the Philippines, and France, he was great.
Posted by: Letalis Maximus, Esq. at December 28, 2009 01:27 PM
Well, I'll be damned.
Posted by: j t bolt at December 28, 2009 02:31 PM