PA court throws out Philadelphia's challenge
Story here. I figured it was just some politicos' publicity stunt anyway -- a city sues the State over its pre-emption laws. The PA Court of Appeals held that, under those laws, Philiadelphia's one-gun-a-month and its "assault weapon" ordinances were invalid.
Doesn't Philly also have an ordinance that barrs open carry? If so, why is this allowed to remain in force under the pre-emption laws?
Posted by: Anonymous at September 26, 2008 02:10 PM