Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« VA kills gunshow bill | Main | More on the Solicitor General's brief »

McCain, and an Oregon iniitiative on gun shows

Posted by David Hardy · 20 January 2008 03:48 PM

Story in the Oregonian.

· Politics

Comments

Interesting - that puts McCain on the negative side of every hot button I have.

Posted by: USCitizen at January 20, 2008 04:13 PM

I'm mostly agnostic on the train wreck that is American immigration policy. But McCain flat out sucks on the 1st and 2nd Amendments.

Posted by: Letalis Maximus, Esq. at January 20, 2008 04:45 PM

McCain. Don't get me started. Train wreck is right, because that's what we can expect if the man is elected president.

I tried to vote him out last time, but he's so entrenched, no one real will run against him.

He's a poster-child for term limits.

Posted by: Herman Munster at January 20, 2008 07:51 PM

Background checks are perhaps the most dangerous threat there is to our gun rights at this time. Actually it's not so much the background checks that are the problem, but the fact that for some inexplicable reason they always seem to need the serial number of the gun to check your background. In other words it's just back door registration. Registration is inevitably followed by confiscation. So if I were writing a commercial to counter a law like this, I would tell people that if they vote for this law, they'll loose their gun rights sooner rather than later, and the fact that they require serial numbers is proof that its about registration not background checks. We already have de facto registration of new purchases in the form of dealer record of sale requirements.

Posted by: Critic at January 21, 2008 01:19 AM

To Critic:

Actually the background check does not transmit firearm serial numbers to NICs. The Dealer records the sale (yes, including the serial number) and keeps it in a permanent file of Form 4473's.

The Forms remain with the dealer and CAN be used for trace requests or reviewed for dealer compliance, but they are NOT (as your post implies) harvested wholesale for 'registration' purposes.

Just thought I's clarify that for the readers out there.

USCitizen

Posted by: USCitizen at January 22, 2008 11:23 PM

The dealer record of sale IS registration of new gun sales. Just because the registration records are distributed doesn't mean the guns aren't registered. If one of these days a law is passed to register or confiscate guns, these records will be used to find the owners. If you claim you no longer have the gun, then like it is with some other laws the burden of proof of innocence will probably be shifted to you and if you don't have a good excuse, like you sold it in a private sale, then you'll probably be convicted of hiding it. A million guys reporting their guns lost a few days before or after a registration law is passed probably won't get off. If you bought ammo for it recently or your mother in law saw you with it, your excuse might not fly. One also wonders if the ATF copies these records when they do their "compliance checks"

Posted by: Critic at January 24, 2008 08:25 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)