Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« DC files Parker/Heller brief | Main | "Gun Guys" and Joyce Foundation »

Blogger's take on DC's brief

Posted by David Hardy · 5 January 2008 09:12 AM

Liebowitz's Canticle has a detailed posting on the DC merits brief.

· Parker v. DC

Comments

The District's Argument that the Bill of Rights doesn't apply to the District would make it possible for the Government to shut down the Washington Post and the Washington Times. I wonder if the Editors of the Washington Post agree with the Districts Premise?

Posted by: Rudy DiGiacinto at January 5, 2008 11:37 AM

Exactly so. It's very simple:

"1. We welcome the Free Press! In order to operate a newspaper, your newspaper must be registered with the District of Columbia. Thanks for complying!

"2. Newspaper registration is now closed. Thanks for applying!

"See? It's not a ban, it's just a regulation. We still allow the press, so the First Amendment doesn't apply. Er, even if it did apply, it only applies to Congress, not local jurisdictions. Er, what were we talking about again?

"I'm quite sure that the Washington Post agrees with us -- disparaging registration could endanger your registration status! They may be reduced to having only 3/5 of a paper, and only then if they can pass a literacy test."

Posted by: Brian Badger at January 5, 2008 12:01 PM

Someone needs to notify the White House. I'd love to see the 101st Airborne (SCREAMING EAGLES) go in and take possession of the Washington Post and "detain" all the employees because they weren't "registered" with the bogus DC government.

Posted by: Fiftycal at January 5, 2008 05:50 PM

101st Airborne wouldn't be needed, They could probably take down DC with a SEAL TEAM or 2

Posted by: Tim at January 6, 2008 04:03 PM

You wouldn't need a SEAL team. Just pay the criminals that already control the streets to detain the criminals that control city hall.

Posted by: straightarrow at January 7, 2008 03:30 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)