Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« A modest proposal to end the straw man issue | Main | Secessionist blog »

Defunding trigger lock sales requirement

Posted by David Hardy · 3 July 2006 10:36 AM

Brady Campaign is bent out of shape over the House rider that prohibits use of appropriated funds to enforce a requirement that guns be sold with triggerlocks.

Note that a funding restriction of this type isn't too useful in itself. It just means no enforcement is possible during the next fiscal year. But since the statute of limitations is five years, I think, anyone who sells without a lock will have to worry about whether the restriction *is* funded next year, and they could go back and prosecute. On the other hand, budget riders, once put on, tend to keep repeating. The ban on use of funds for giving "relief from disability" to own guns is probably still in there, after a decade or so.

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)