« DoJ sues California over the 2A and carry permits! | Main
Supreme Court grants cert on Hawaii case
Alan Beck is attorney of record. Granted as to question presented No. 1. The questions presented were:
"1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding, in direct conflict with the Second Circuit, that Hawaii may presumptively prohibit the carry of handguns by licensed concealed carry permit holders on private property open to the public unless the property owner affirmatively gives express permission to the handgun carrier?
2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in solely relying on post-Reconstruction Era and later laws in applying Bruen's text, history and tradition test in direct conflict with the holdings of the Third, Fifth, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits?"

Barron(1833) negates the applicability to the 2nd of all state laws from 1833 to present. Incorporation (the BS that it is) has not fully repudiated Barron. If the 2nd doesn't apply to the states, then state laws do not revers apply to the 2nd or any other BoR. Not hard to follow for IQs over 3.