Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Just about functional, and.... | Main

Supreme Court shoots down Mexico's lawsuit against US gun makers

Posted by David Hardy · 5 June 2025 11:12 PM

Smith and Wesson vs. Estados Unitos Mexicanos, handed down today. It's as smashing a loss as a case can take. 9-0. Justice Kagan, of the liberal wing, writes the opinion. Justice Jackson, also of that wing, writes a concurrence that essentially says, Justice Kagan was too nice to you legal morons, get out of here:

"I view Mexico's allegations as insufficient to satisfy PLCAA's predicate exception, regardless of whether the business practices described might suffice to establish aiding-and-abetting or other forms of vicarious liability in distinct statutory or common-law contexts.... Devoid of nonconclusory allegations about particular statutory violations, Mexico's lawsuit seeks to turn the courts into common-law regulators. But Congress passed PLCAA to preserve the primacy of the political branches--both state and federal--in deciding which duties to impose on the firearms industry."

But, lest we think the other side might learn its lesson, the local newspapers are reporting they mean to press ahead with their lawsuits here.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

David Lawson | June 6, 2025 12:39 AM | Reply

It is even more interesting that two of the liberal justices admit that AR-15s are in common use for lawful purposes. Hope to see them choke on that if we ever get an AWB case to them.

Flight-ER-Doc | June 6, 2025 8:23 AM | Reply

I suppose this would be too banal for the Supremes, but a decision from the bench that said "NO! GTFO Now!" would have been quite appropriate.

Flight-ER-Doc | June 7, 2025 3:02 PM | Reply

And Mexico's President has said they will continue to attempt litigation - against distributors now.

I suppose that's bad news for the DoJ

Leave a comment