<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Of Arms and the Law</title>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/</link>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:10:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.15</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Results of Georgia bill allowing carry in restaurants that serve drinks</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Over at the Atlanta Examiner, Ed Stone has <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-5619-Atlanta-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m7d1-One-year-anniversary-of-HB-89-arrives-without-dire-consequences" target="_blank"> thoughts on the first anniversary of HB 89</a>, which allowed carrying in restaurants and on mass transit. He cites media predictions of mass drunken violence, "escalated gunfight with dozens of innocent Georgians paying the price," etc. ...</p>

<p>The one problem being that, as might be expected, so such thing has ever happened.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/07/results_of_geor.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/07/results_of_geor.php</guid>
<category>State legislation</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:10:49 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is Nordyke&apos;s 2A/14A section holding or dictum?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Prof. Volokh argues that Nordyke's finding that the 14th Amendment incorporates the 2nd Amendment is <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1246072740.shtml" target="_blank"> part of its holding, and not dictum</a>.</p>

<p>BTW, postings have been slack because I'm still recovering from the operation. Had a complication, infection, that put me on my back for days, and now another -- a tube into me that came partially loose -- and this does tend to reduce blogging time!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/is_nordykes_2a1.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/is_nordykes_2a1.php</guid>
<category>Nordyke v. King</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>DC v. Heller--a one year roundup</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>At <a href="http://reason.com/blog/show/134402.html" target="_blank"> Reason Hit and Run</a>. To think it's only been one year...</p>

<p>Hat tip to Instapundit....</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/dc_v_hellera_on.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/dc_v_hellera_on.php</guid>
<category>Parker v. DC</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:36:04 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>local media on Mexican gun problems</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Story <a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/border/298845" target="_blank"> here</a>. An all too typical piece, written in a few hours. There are gun shows, interview and quote some antigunners, make claims without proof (i.e., that four firearms are the weapons of choice), confuse full and semiauto, and publish.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/local_media_on.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/local_media_on.php</guid>
<category>media</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:56:28 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Petition for cert. in 2nd Cir incorporation case</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>PDf is <a href="http://homepages.nyu.edu/~jmm257/cert-petition-w-appendix.pdf" target="_blank"> here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/petition_for_ce_1.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/petition_for_ce_1.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:25:07 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sandy Froman on Sonia Sotomayer</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Her Townhall column is <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/SandyFroman/2009/06/24/nra_members_must_oppose_sotomayor?page=full&comments=true" target="_blank"> here</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/sandy_froman_on_2.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/sandy_froman_on_2.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:55:35 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Case with NFA list implications</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-591.ZS.html" target="_blannk">Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts</a>, handed down today. Defendant charged with cocaine possession. To prove it was coke, State introduced a sworn lab report to that effect. Defendant's objections that this violated his right to be confronted with the witnesses against him was rejected. Supreme Court holds for defendant. The key evidence against him is a claim that the substance he had was cocaine: government must produce testimony from the lab that "accuses" him of that, not just put in a written report.</p>

<p>Might have some relevance as to the often-impeached ATF certification that an NFA gun is not on their list of registrations (although there might be an issue as to whether that list is treated as business records, and thus the certificate allowable).</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/case_with_nfa_l.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/case_with_nfa_l.php</guid>
<category>National Firearms Act</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:21:38 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lautenburg proposes &quot;terror watch list&quot; to be disqualifier for guns</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>And <a href="http://www.classicalvalues.com/archives/2009/06/your_rights_are.html" target="_blank"> Classical Values takes him apart</a>.</p>

<p>Update: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Fly_List" target="_blank"> some data</a> on that list.  Ted Kennedy's name wound up on it; it took three weeks of personal appeals to get it off. "Kennedy said of "ordinary citizens": "How are they going to be able to get to be treated fairly and not have their rights abused?""</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/lautenburg_prop.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/lautenburg_prop.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:14:50 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>US district court splits the constitutional baby</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Discussion <a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1245366067.shtml" target="_blank">here</a>, over at the Volokh Conspiracy.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/us_district_cou.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/us_district_cou.php</guid>
<category>prohibitted persons</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:48:42 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>PA appeals court strikes down Philadelphia gun ordinance</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Story <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/pennsylvania/20090618_ap_statecourtagainstrikesdownphillygunlaws.html" target="_blank"> here</a>. </p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/pa_appeals_cour.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/pa_appeals_cour.php</guid>
<category>State legislation</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:11:43 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fed subpoena online newspaper comments</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Story <a href="http://www.lawofficer.com/news-and-articles/news/2009/06/online_comment_subpoena.html" target="_blank"> here</a>. A newspaper story on a tax prosecution drew some overwrought comments, and the prosecution team wants to know all about the commenters.</p>

<p>The prosecution is interesting -- I remember someone asking this question 30 years ago. If a person agrees to be paid thirty dollars -- but only via thirty rare silver dollars, each worth $1000 -- is his taxable income from that $30 or $30,000? </p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/fed_subpoena_on.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/fed_subpoena_on.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:19:41 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Results in SAF/Alan Gura suit against DC</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>SAF, rep'd by Alan Gura, sued DC in a followup action to challenge its post-Heller handgun regs. A recent SAF bulletin reports that DC has caved on one of the major provisions, i.e., adoption of the California list of "approved" handguns.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/results_in_safa.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/results_in_safa.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:14:51 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>An interesting auction</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It's for the revolver that police Capt. Timothy O'Neil <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/business/1628547,CST-NWS-DILLINGERGUN18.article" target="_blank"> used against Dillinger in Dillinger's last gunfight</a>.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/an_interesting_12.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/an_interesting_12.php</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:44:24 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NY Times on incorporation</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Article <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/17guns.html" target="_blank"> here</a>. It's ... almost balanced. Of course the problem the MSM has is that while one can give a knee-jerk label of conservative to gun rights, the opposite label attaches to incorporation.</p>

<p>"Incorporation fell out of favor after the 1960s, but a new generation of largely liberal scholars of law and history have brought it back into the intellectual mainstream, said Akhil Reed Amar, a law professor at Yale University, who supports the process.</p>

<p>“The precedents are now supportive of incorporation of nearly every provision of the Bill of Rights,” Professor Amar said. “Now what’s odd is that the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to the states.”</p>

<p>Sanford Levinson, a law professor at the University of Texas, said he would be surprised if the Supreme Court accepted these gun cases, because some of the conservative justices on the court had scoffed at incorporation arguments in the past and might not want to set a precedent.</p>

<p>Professor Amar, however, argued that the justices would not only take up the case but would also ultimately vote for incorporation of the Second Amendment."</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/ny_times_on_inc.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/ny_times_on_inc.php</guid>
<category>14th Amendment</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:18:08 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anti-stabbing knife on sale in Britain</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Story <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6501720.ece" target="_blank"> here</a>. Its inventor "was inspired by a documentary in which doctors advocated banning traditional knives."</p>

<p>And to think these guys' fathers held off the Nazis....</p>

<p>Hat tip to reader Jim Kindred....</p>]]></description>
<link>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/antistabbing_kn.php</link>
<guid>http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2009/06/antistabbing_kn.php</guid>
<category>non-US</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:48:32 -0700</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>