Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
TheSurvivalistBlog.net
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Officer handcuffs victim | Main | Gun rights doing well ... in India »

VCDL patch in an unusual location

Posted by David Hardy · 31 January 2010 05:51 PM

A Der Spiegel Online image of two rescuers evacuating an injured Haitian. It sure looks like the seal of Virginia Citizens' Defense League, a blue minuteman image against a white background surrounded by a red circle, and in the circle white letters forming four words.

Comments

Not as unusual as you might think.

The helo in the background is an MH-60S. They are flown by several Navy squadrons, one of which is HSC-28, home-based in Norfolk, Virginia (full disclosure, I was stationed there for three years when it was still HC-8 and flew the CH-46).

HSC-28 is currently deployed to Haiti with the USS Nassau.

Not surprising at all that a sailor stationed in Virginia would be a Second Amendment advocate and supporter of the premier gun rights advocacy group in Virginia. I know I was when I was still active duty and am now an Executive Member and staff blogger for VCDL.

Posted by: Sailorcurt at January 31, 2010 07:48 PM

VERY cool!

Posted by: Turk Turon at January 31, 2010 07:58 PM

I have never served in the military, so I do not know. Is an active duty member allowed to wear a patch of a civilian political organization on their uniform?

Posted by: Left Coast Conservative at January 31, 2010 08:31 PM

It would be unusual if they were allowed to wear a non-issue patch in a public manner.

Posted by: James at January 31, 2010 09:49 PM

Non-Coms don't necessarily have to see it. Officers usually can't find their own asses. The ones that can, learn from their non-coms.

Posted by: straightarrow at January 31, 2010 10:12 PM

The flight suit is considered "organizational clothing". It is still an official uniform subject to the uniform regulations, but there is some latitude given because it's not worn in public but only under certain specified conditions...i.e. when actually in flight status.

The only patches that are specified by Navy uniform regulations are the breast patches (left breast is nametag, right breast is command logo). The shoulder patches are optional.

The left shoulder patch is pretty traditionally the US Flag patch, the right shoulder patch is where you'll see personal statements. Technically, by the uniform regs, the patch should be flight related (aircraft type, flight hours milestones, things like that), but that's really up to the command. Some commands won't say a thing if you have a personal, non flight related patch on there.

This is especially true while deployed. Allowing some latitude in things like that raises morale and esprit de corps, so a blind eye tends to be turned (within reason, of course), during deployments.

Finally, by Navy uniform regs, all of the patches are secured to the flight suit by velcro, so it is nothing to change the patches out when deployed and change them back when you go home if the command doesn't permit personal patches when at home base.

Probably a more complicated answer than you were expecting, but it is what it is. Hope that answered your question.

Posted by: Sailorcurt at February 1, 2010 06:44 AM

Zooming in on the image, it certainly looks like a VCDL patch; the lower right word, on a 300% (in-browser) magnification certainly *looks* like "League". (The lower left word is not quite readable at that point.)

Good on 'im!

Posted by: Lysander at February 4, 2010 07:06 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)