Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Survival Tips : The Survivalist Blog
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Case involving GA open carry settles | Main | And a VA open carry case settles, too... »

Los Angeles decides Calif gun laws are just too loose

Posted by David Hardy · 17 December 2008 09:22 PM

Story here. I mean, the State only outlaws .50 caliber rifles, but not possession of their ammunition. It doesn't require registration of ordinary ammunition sales.

Hat tip to reader Robert E. ....

· State legislation

Comments

The level of "but that doesn't follow" that I was feeling on reading that article was astounding, and it started with the very first sentence.

The City Council on Wednesday approved several ordinances aimed at curbing gun and gang violence, including a ban on ammunition used in assault rifles capable of shooting helicopters from the sky.

So they're aiming at curbing gang violence by outlawing ammo that's not used by gangs at all. How many helicopters have the LA Crips shot down this year?

"there's no need for this type of weapon in an urban environment," police Chief William Bratton said at a news conference as he held up a .50-caliber bullet, easily longer than a finger.
...
Officials said the new rules make Los Angeles one of the strictest for gun rules of any big city, and Bratton said he hoped they would be enacted on a national level.

So in a couple paragraphs he went from "in an urban environment" to "on a national level." Awesome. So much for "what works in Cheyenne might not work in Chicago."

"This is not about the Second Amendment or the rights of law abiding gun owners," Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said. "This is about the safety of our kids."

As of Dec. 13, there had been 354 homicides in the city. Villaraigosa said 80 percent of all homicides in Los Angeles are gun-related.


So Mayor V, what percentage of those 80 percent were not gang members? And what percentage of those 80 percent were killed with the ammunition you just outlawed? My guess on those two answers are "less than 5%" and "bagel, goose-egg, nada".

Posted by: JT at December 17, 2008 10:36 PM

Its always for the children.

Will the last sane person leaving California please turn out the lights?

I mean, they don't have fence around the freaking place. Why do ya'll stay?

Oh yeah. The weather. I forgot. The weather is nice.

Well, have a nice day, then.

Suckers.

Posted by: Letalis Maximus, Esq. at December 18, 2008 06:41 AM

As a retired Army helicopter pilot I would certainly be interested in how they define ammunition capable of shooting down a helicopter. From my experience the round does not have to come from an assault rifle, a 30-30 Marlin is more than capable.

Posted by: Jim K at December 18, 2008 08:48 AM

A few years ago (10-12) a couple of car-stealing punks were trying to evade the Inyo County Sheriff out in the Mojave Desert of southeastern Inyo County (near Death Valley NP). They fired at a CHP helicopter tracking them with a .303 Enfield and forced it to land. As Jim K said almost any centerfire rifle cartridge will bring down a a helicopter if it hits the right spot.

Posted by: Hank Archer at December 18, 2008 09:19 AM

Jim K - shhhh, they are dumb enough don't need to help them :)

Posted by: Jim K at December 18, 2008 12:00 PM

uh, what good is the ammunition with the rifle?

Posted by: Tom at December 18, 2008 07:06 PM

d'oh! without the rifle?

Posted by: Tom at December 18, 2008 07:06 PM

I've got a complaint!

My friend Harlan's UH-1C was shot down by VC with AKs and SKS rifles, and probably a few Arisakas, M1s, and Enfields in the mix.

According to LA, his helicopter should not have crashed in the poorly chosen LZ? Or is it that LAPD (AKA civilian) helicopters have been "up-armored" and are immune from general small arms fire, unlike many military helicopters?

Posted by: Thomas at December 23, 2008 11:46 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)