Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
TheSurvivalistBlog.net
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Obama Admin. asks applicants whether they own guns | Main | Banning guns by their bore size »

Obama Admin snubbing Civil Rights Act?

Posted by David Hardy · 14 November 2008 08:34 AM

Their questionaire for political appointees (for thousands of positions, BTW, not just cabinet posts) asks about arrests. "There are no time limits for some information, including liens, tax audits, lawsuits, legal charges, bankruptcies or arrests." "Only the smallest details are excluded; traffic tickets carrying fines of less than $50 need not be reported, the application says."

But the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission takes a very dim view of considering arrest records in hiring and firing. Arrest without conviction proves very little, and arrests disproportionately impact minorities. The commission's advice to employers is that merely asking for arrest records may be violation: "Even where there is no direct evidence that an employer used an arrest record in an employment decision, a pre-employment inquiry regarding arrest records may violate Title VII. It is generally presumed that an employer only asks questions which he/she deems relevant to the employment decision." It advises that even with a conviction the employer must weight its gravity, how long ago it happened, and how it relates to the job.

I'd assume Title VII of the Civil Rights Act does not apply to political appointments (political operations usually except themselves from employment laws), but even so, I'd hope that the incoming administration wouldn't be quite so obvious in disregarding its spirit!

Comments

No "civil right act" applies to either the Congress or the White House. De' all be exempt.

Posted by: 30yearProf at November 14, 2008 09:32 AM

I thought that the living constitution guys were very much in favor of construing the anti-discrimination statutes in an extremely expansive manner, even when it went against the text of the statute.

Posted by: Jim W at November 14, 2008 12:52 PM

color me shocked!

Posted by: Tom at November 14, 2008 02:07 PM

Laws apply to the proles, not the overlords. All hail the new nomenclatura!

Posted by: Flighterdoc at November 14, 2008 02:57 PM

Well, Valerie Jarrett, co-chair (or somethign close to that) of Obama's transition team has stated on the record the he is ready to "rule" on day 1.

God help us. Try reading Lamentations for clues to our future.

Dominus providebit!

Posted by: FWB at November 14, 2008 03:03 PM

He isn't ready for anything that is why despots
like Ahmadinejad congratulate him on his
big "victory" and then 15 minutes they
are back to threatening them.


I am sure the Taliban and al-Qaeda are
thrilled that he won too since he favors
détente with them as well.

Posted by: Marcus Poulin at November 14, 2008 07:36 PM

Well, what do you expect from someone who takes advice from ACORN. They couldn't be bothered to pay the current minimum wage to employees working for the "Living Wage" initiative in California. Laws for others, not for the anointed.

Posted by: JKB at November 14, 2008 08:27 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)