« Exhibiting at NRA Convention | Main | A Canadian take on the NRA Convention »
Sandy Froman on the election and future Supreme Courts
Here's Sandy's latest Townhall column, on that subject. She makes some excellent points.
Update: typo corrected, thanks.
Comments
Thats Sandy Froman, not Forman
Posted by: Anonymous at May 15, 2008 09:53 PM
If what Sandy says regarding the Supreme Court nominations is true, and Senator McCain is the best hope for gun owners to get their type of justices on the Supreme Court, then why in the world is former Congressman Bob Barr making a bid for the Independent party's presidential nomination? I thought Congressman Barr was suppose to be an ally to gun owners. I can only see him taking votes away from Senator McCain, which according to Sandy would be a very bad thing. Can someone explain this to me? Does Congressman Barr believe that he might take votes away from Senators Obama or Clinton, thereby helping out Senator McCain? I don't see this as a likely outcome.
Posted by: robert12 at May 16, 2008 03:00 AM
Barr is running because his ego has compelled him to. Or because he has an ax to grind. Or because he craves media attention.
He is not running because he thinks it would be good for the US. He is much to intelligent to believe anything like that.
Posted by: Jim at May 16, 2008 03:08 PM
SEBASTIAN at Snowflakesinhell LIVEBLOGGED McCain's NRA speech: "The theme seems to be 'I suck a little, but my opponents suck more.'"
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2008/05/16/live-blogging-the-mccain-speech/
Posted by: 30yearProf at May 16, 2008 06:50 PM
Voting for McCain is like voting for George H.W. Bush after he signed the "assault weapon" import ban executive order. In your heart, you know you shouldn't reward duplicity.
The NRA is going to have an uphill battle getting it's more intelligent members to support this unrepentant Turkey.
Posted by: 30yearProf at May 16, 2008 06:55 PM
I have no illusions about McInsane, but it is worth pointing out that he is no worse than GW Bush on 2A issues, and in fact, opposes a renewal of the AWB, while Bush said he'd sign it.
Posted by: david at May 17, 2008 11:15 AM
David:
Are you saying you'd vote for Ronald Reagan because he was hard on communism but harder on machine guns (18 USC 922 (o))?
Please do not vote for McCain if you gun a gun not made by Remington and can take detach mags. He'll turn right around and ban assault weapons anyway. He's lying about Assault Weapons. That's what politicians (and the NRA for that matter) do.
Posted by: Paul Henning at May 17, 2008 03:31 PM
I don't get why there is so much butthurt going around these days.
McCain-Feingold is essentially gutted from FEC v WRTL. There is essentially nothing left to argue over.
McCain isn't going to get his gun show loophole bill.
McCain has had opportunities to vote for assault weapons in the past, back when it wasn't considered politically risky and he voted against it.
Posted by: Jim W at May 17, 2008 05:31 PM
Jim, would you give any other thief a pass because his robbery attempt was mostly foiled?
Posted by: straightarrow at May 20, 2008 02:54 PM
