Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home

Ghillie Suits and Gear

Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
TheSurvivalistBlog.net
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Third graders plot attack on teacher | Main | Lost our public defender »

I give up hopes for our language

Posted by David Hardy · 2 April 2008 12:16 AM

Harvard, where you must talk as if your teeth were wired together, advertises for a law school job with: "Duties and Responsibilities: Works proactively and independently with minimal oversight to conduct research and analyze results, while also functioning as part of a research team or working group."

Harvardians: there is no such word as "proactive." The converse of reactive is active. If there were a converse to reactive, which there is not, it would be preactive, from the stem pre, or before in the sense of time, rather than pro, in the sense of in favor of.

Comments

They must have gone here to find it:
www.merriam-webster.com slash dictionary slash proactive.

It lists a definition for the word. pro + reactive.

Posted by: Mark A. Murray at April 2, 2008 05:19 AM

Language changes all the time and there is nothing we really can do about it. I have pet peeves, but what can I really do but speak and write as I see the language. Most people these day confuse affect and effect, so they punt and use impact. They have reversed the meaning of peruse from "to read thoroughly" to "scan over quickly". Nouns get verbed all the time. We now rearchitect a software system, rather than redesign it.

Posted by: Roger at April 2, 2008 07:42 AM

A redneck gets into Harvard on a diversity/scholarship.

On his first day, he walks up to an upperclassman and asks; "Exsuse me. Can you tell me where the admissions office is at?"

The older student appears shocked, and states condescendingly; "Young man, this is Harvard. You will soon learn that at this institution, we do not end our sentences with prepositions."

The redneck replies; "Sorry. Can you tell me where the admissions office is at, asshole."

Posted by: Chris at April 2, 2008 09:01 AM

One of my long-time teeth-gritters: "remediate."

Evolved, to my knowledge, from the environmental field (my first career). "EPA is requiring us to remediate the site." Or, "It will cost us $400,000 to remediate the contamination."

Remediation is a noun. The verb form is remedy. The adjective is remedial (i.e., "remedial action").

"EPA is requiring us to remedy the contamination at the site." There ya go!

Sadly, government agencies and courts have taken up use of "remediate."

...and several others...

Posted by: Bill at April 2, 2008 03:13 PM

I've always been intrigued by the words 'unrelenting' and 'relentless', to never give up, never surrender.

So in order to give myself a break from a potentially out-of-control type A personality, I have learned to 'relent', or give myself a break.

In order to achieve harmony with the universe, I am now trying to 'lent' myself more frequently. Which probably means 'to pursue.' As I stared at myself in the mirror one morning, I realized tThere's got to be a dog-in-the-grass, Alice in Wonderland through-the-looking-glass metaphor in there somewhere.

Alas, I have no desire to chase the 50-yr old flabby bald guy I saw on the other side...

Posted by: Jim D. at April 2, 2008 05:02 PM

To add to the Pointlessly Big Words collection: what's with "utilize"? I've never seen a sentence where utilize couldn't be replaced with use without affecting the meaning in the slightest.

"Nouns get verbed all the time."

"Verbed" being a prime example of it, and why it can be annoying. I think (to be specific: I'm pulling this out of my ass) that as you learn a language and build a vocabulary and a grammar, you assign different words their "proper" part of speech. So your natural sense of linguistic wrongness is going to tag it when a person uses a word in a sense that you learned is incorrect.

The thing is that language peeves are a natural part of your personal grammar.

Oh, and I think proactive is a perfectly good word. In my usage, pro- means "preventative or denying", as in proscription or proscribe, and active means "in the nature of an action." Proactive means that what you are doing is something to prevent or deny, and you're usually referring to preventing a future problem. So that's why it makes sense to me. Most people are just unfamiliar with the prefix pro-.

Posted by: ben at April 3, 2008 11:58 AM

Irregardless. HUH!

Posted by: straightarrrow at April 4, 2008 12:30 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)