Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Now a surprising article from BBC | Main | Newspaper gets list of CCW holders »

Government found liable

Posted by David Hardy · 25 April 2008 09:41 AM

here's a report of a verdict and settlement over a 911 call. The woman was being beaten, and ultimately smothered, while she made repeated 911 calls. For some reason the dispatcher merely sent out a call relating a domestic disturbance. The officers took 26 minutes to respond, found nobody responded to the door, and naturally left (you don't bust down a door over a report of a "disturbance," esp. when all seems peaceful).

As a general rule a person cannot sue for a failure to protect. The story refers to a finding of recklessness, which suggests to me that in this state you can sue for a reckless or willful failure.

Hat tip to Curtis Lowe and his blog.

Comments

When seconds count, dial 9-1-1. The police are only hours awaay

Posted by: Flighterdoc, MD at April 25, 2008 10:29 AM

I wonder what the implications are vis-a-vis the multiple standing rulings that the police have no legal obligation to put themselves in a dangerous situation to assist a civilian, given that the target of the suit was very specifically the 911 dispatchers and NOT the responding officer.

Posted by: JT at April 25, 2008 01:09 PM

I will very interested to see what happens to this verdict on appeal. The "system" don't like verdicts like this.

Posted by: Letalis Maximus, Esq. at April 25, 2008 02:08 PM

See "no right to police protection case" as an international human rights case at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights - Jessica Gonzaels (now Lenahan) versus United States, Petition No: P-1490-05:

http://www.iachr.org/annualrep/2007eng/USA1490.05eng.htm

Then my own Second Amendment case for "National Open Carry Handgun" as a human right at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) - Don Hamrick versus United States and United Nations, Petition No. P-1142-06 as a counterbalance to Jessica Gonzales' No Right to Police Protection case. My case is still under investigation by the IACHR.

REMEMBER: "National Open Carry Handgun" is the "holy grail" of the Second Amendment's right to keep and bear arms. National Open Carry "is" your Ninth Amendment right! DON'T GIVE IT UP!

Posted by: Don Hamrick at April 26, 2008 06:46 AM

I'm afraid all this verdict does is give police incentive to kick your door in when they respond to a 911 call if you don't answer. To not do so would be 'reckless'.

Posted by: Jim D. at April 27, 2008 02:03 PM

It will be overturned on appeal. We can't have the government liable for not protecting people now can we.....?

Posted by: ParatrooperJJ at April 28, 2008 07:54 AM

Yep, overturned on appeal. No liability.

Posted by: Trevor at April 28, 2008 09:39 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)