Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« ATF's mtn for summary judgment denied in Red's Trading Post case | Main | Nomination of new ATF head: AP picks up on story »

An impressive letter to the editor

Posted by David Hardy · 25 January 2008 01:20 PM

About a battlfield convert, over at keepandbeararms.com.

· Self defense

Comments

Doesn't pass the smell test for me.

It reads like wishful thinking. Barring an actual name attached, I don't think the story is real. It's too pat.

Take a non-gunnie shooting, that does more for our cause than you will ever know.

Posted by: jlbraun at January 25, 2008 01:25 PM

Not merely too pat, the woman has to be breathtakingly stupid (although that is known---and in every other way she seems to be and still be so...) to have continued to approach her vehicle once she realized the situation. They aren't called "Street Smarts" for nothing, else I might not have survived my years in college in the People's Republic of Massachusetts....

Posted by: Harold at January 25, 2008 03:02 PM

Yeah, the mea culpa gets piled pretty high, doesn't it? But maybe she just has no sense of shame.

Posted by: W. Bailey at January 25, 2008 07:20 PM

It reads like wishful thinking. Barring an actual name attached, I don't think the story is real. It's too pat.

That's what I thought. Sounds like it's written about someone who knows more gun-nut jargon than a former anti.

Posted by: ben at January 25, 2008 08:15 PM

I started getting the creeps about half way through the letter, so am reassured to see that it seems to have had the same effect on others. I'm hesitant to believe this really happened, and I wonder what sort of person makes up a story like this.

Posted by: Flash Gordon at January 26, 2008 06:29 AM

Sadly, I have to agree with the commenters above. I think it was rescuer's line which finally sealed it for me.

Posted by: HokiePundit at January 26, 2008 07:25 AM

She says that she didn't get the phone number of the man who rescued her. Couldn't she get it off of the police report? Or did they just let some knife wielding scumbags who try to kidnap women with small children get away without calling the police? This happened at a McDonald's, and they have phones there. I've seen them!

She says that she was at the Million Mom March, where she saw Rosie. So this must have been the one in 2000. Eight years ago and her letter is just now getting attention? Or did she wait eight years before writing it?

She also says that she just bought a shotgun for home defense. If the letter isn't close to a decade old then she took her own sweet time after her experience to finally get around to it.

I'm with everyone else who expressed skepticism. Unless there are names and dates that can be matched to official records of the foiled assault (police reports for a start), then this letter just screams fraud.

James

Posted by: James R. Rummel at January 26, 2008 05:49 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)