Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Shooting at New Life Church | Main | Canada registers stolen guns to new owners »

"Use" of a firearm in a drug transaction

Posted by David Hardy · 10 December 2007 11:47 AM

The Supreme Court ruled today in Watson v. US. Watson concerned a defendant who got a lengthy sentence for a use of a firearm in drug offense, where he bartered drugs in exchange for getting a gun.

The Court, per Justice Souter, holds that *receiving* the gun in such a trade is not "using" it. The majority distinguishes earlier case law holding that *giving* the gun in such a deal can be using it. Justice Ginsburg concurs with a note that she'd overrule the earlier case relating to giving, as well: the likely Congressional intent was to punish "use" in the sense of using a gun as a tool, not just as property for barter.

Comments

Frick and Frack at their best...

Posted by: reloader at December 10, 2007 12:28 PM

I wonder how the justices square that in their mind with a similar decision several years back that a firearm "carried" in the trunk of a car during a drug transaction is "carried" for the purposes of a similar law...

To be fair, Ginsburg dissented from that opinion, and also drafted this Watson opinion.

Posted by: Jim at December 10, 2007 12:37 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)