Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Clayton Cramer & SF Chronicle on inner cities and crime | Main | There are worse things than being robbed at gunpoint »

Good Op-Ed

Posted by David Hardy · 14 December 2007 12:35 PM

In the Portland (ME) Press Herald:

"Has anyone ever wondered why people with guns who have kissed sanity good-bye never take out their uncontrollable rage on the nearest police station?

Nor do they drive off to the nearest Army base, shooting range or hunting club to vent their murderous frustration.

It should only take a moment's thought to understand why: Those places have people who have relatively easy access to weapons themselves.

It's one thing to be homicidal and suicidal, but it's quite another to consider that one's murderous intent could be brought to an untimely halt through the immediate application of superior firepower.

However, there are places that draw these people like magnets, and they, too, are easy to locate: They are the places where the possession of firearms is forbidden, and that fact is widely advertised.

Some of these places even go so far as to publicly display their vulnerability to mass murder through the posting of signs that say "No Guns Permitted" or "Gun-Free Zone.""

Comments

It is a good editorial, but his first statement is not exactly true. Nutjobs do sometimes go to police stations to take out their rage. They just don't become mass killers in the process. See http://www.officer.com/web/online/Top-News-Stories/Detective--Suspect-Killed-in-Virginia-Police-Station-Attack/1$30306

Posted by: Robin at December 14, 2007 01:36 PM

This raises another interesting question; if someone is going to commit suicide anyway, why do they prolong the experience by shooting up the firearms free - free fire zones? Some thought must have gone into the selection of location, right?

Posted by: Chris at December 14, 2007 05:13 PM

Excellent piece!

I visit several pro-Second Amendment websites per day, and I send this stuff off to everyone I know just to keep them up to speed on public opinion on this subject throughout the country.

It is important for us all to stay tuned in to as many states as possible--and to pass the good word whenever it gets spoken (or written!).

Thanks, Dave.

Posted by: Tarn Helm at December 14, 2007 07:10 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)