Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Five arrested after student seen with nerf ball gun | Main | Good news & bad news at Red's »

Richmond ice cream store defender not indicted

Posted by David Hardy · 5 November 2007 02:30 PM

Story here. He shot a fleeing robber, which is technically a no-no, but the grand jury did the right rather than the legal thing. (It is rather funny that the prosecutor said he thought he might at least get a misdemeanor discharging a firearm in a public place out of it).

Hat tip to reader Rudy DiGiacinto..

· Self defense

Comments

We need a lot more of this type of action by juries of both stripes to discourage overzealous prosecutors.

I am glad to see they did the right thing. When justice and the law are on collision course, the law should always give way. If that happens often enough the law and justice will become synonymous again.

Posted by: straightarrow at November 5, 2007 04:55 PM

I agree with the prosecutor.

The fact that the people returned "no true bill" on the prosecutor's attempt to discourage civic virtue does indeed show that the legal system can work, despite its ministers' best efforts to subvert the spirit of the laws.

As the prosecutor himself expressed it, "This is an indication that the system works."

Of course, I agree even more with the five-member panel that educated the prosecutor in how to do his job.

Posted by: Tarn Helm at November 5, 2007 07:02 PM

More details in this morning's paper here: [url]http://www.inrich.com/cva/ric/news.apx.-content-articles-RTD-2007-11-06-0143.html[/url]

It did not look good for a while there - the clerk fired 11 shots at the guy as he was running away. The grand jury did not indict, apparently in part because nobody could prove whether the fatal bullet was one of the eight fired outside the store or one of the three fired inside the store.

The robber had an "extensive criminal history" including "several robbery convictions." Forgive me if I don't get too broken up over his demise.

Posted by: Bill at November 6, 2007 06:26 AM

Not only will I not get broken up over his demise, I want to dance a celebratory jig on the scumbag's grave. It's a great day -- one less bad guy in the world and the poor victim (who used poor judgment chasing him out the door) isn't further victimized.

Unfortunately, the poor victim will get screwed in a civil suit.

Posted by: Brian at November 6, 2007 08:44 AM

I think the important part of the story is that the young man is not some "trigger happy" cowboy as some in the media (let's say a certain female reporter in Dallas) would have you believe people that have a gun for personal defense are. According to his father, he is still dealing with the fact he took another life, even if that life was a worthless piece of human debris.

I bet that is the last time that ice cream shop (which had been robbed prior to this incident) is robbed again.

Posted by: David at November 6, 2007 09:04 AM

Tarn

I bet you would have a different opinion if you had to pay the legal bill involved. People need to understand that altought the system "may" work from time to time it is very costly for the defendant in terms of money and stress.

My experience is that Pros. are more concerned with convictions then with doing the "right thing"

the fact that he "thought he might at least get a misdemeanor discharging a firearm in a public place" proves my point.

Posted by: David McCleary at November 7, 2007 06:38 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)