Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Ted Nugent gives considered opinions on '08 race | Main | New Army sniping rifle »

John Edwards and straw man transactions

Posted by David Hardy · 24 August 2007 08:54 PM

Story here.

(To be fair, there's no indication that Edwards knew he was the beneficiary of a straw deal -- that is, it sounds as if the donor knew very well that he was setting up thousands of dollars in straw donations, but at least just now there is no indication that Edwards knew of the arrangements.).

Via Instapundit...

· Politics

Comments

He didn't know? And your point would be what exactly? If this was a gun purchase it would constitute "willful violation" would it not?

Posted by: straightarrow at August 24, 2007 09:53 PM

Fieger's spinning it as politically-driven prosecution.

The charge doesn't make sense-if the donations weren't straw donations, he should say so. If they were, they are against the law.

If they are common, he could claim that, and then claim that he is being targeted for his political leanings. However, if they are common, maybe he could provide evidence leading prosecutors to those other cases.

I am slightly amused: Fieger has pushed for publicity several times before (Defended Jack Kevorkian, ran for governor). This doesn't look like good publicity for him.

Posted by: karrde at August 27, 2007 09:00 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)