Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Karl Rove's parthian shot | Main | Old West homicide rates »

Great slow-mo videography

Posted by David Hardy · 26 August 2007 10:17 AM

In a British antigun commercial.

Comments

Cool! Makes me wanna go out and shoot something.

Posted by: Letalis at August 26, 2007 10:52 AM

I liked the one with the big water bottle best. I'd like to know what they were using - shotgun slug? Looked like a pretty hefty round.

Posted by: Bill at August 26, 2007 11:10 AM

Looks fake to me. The relative size of the bullet looks weird compared to the size of for example the watermelon. Seems to me the bullet should look larger for the apple and smaller for the melon or the jug.

Posted by: tom bri at August 26, 2007 06:27 PM

Quite possibly they used different calibers for different items. I'm sure they were going for the most dramatic explosive effect. A .22 wouldn't make that water bottle explode like that. Heck, it probably wouldn't make the apple explode, either.

Posted by: Bill at August 26, 2007 08:15 PM

All fake. The relative size of the bullet to the objects hit isn't correct, especially the watermelon. Also the speed of the bullet relative to the flying fragments of the objects shot at. All fake

Posted by: Mike Gordon at August 26, 2007 08:48 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)