Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Assault on Waco | Main | Toronto Sun on gun registry »

Media on gun buybacks

Posted by David Hardy · 18 September 2006 07:37 PM

Newsbusters has a post on how, when the WashPo and the AP ran a story on a DC guy buyback, they for some reason couldn't find a single skeptic or critic to balance the story.

Actually, I rather like gun buybacks. I've got a cheapy gun I got at a yard sale and which has broken down, and I'd be happy to get $50-100 for it, when no buyer in their right mind would offer that. Last time we had one in Tucson, every gunny in town got rid of their old junk. I later got the records of what was turned in, and it was pretty funny. Air guns, gun parts (apparently the folks operating the buyback didn't know guns). A "Mars" brand revolver (those were cheapies made around the 1890s).

Some gun collectors took up station outside the collection points, and if they saw someone with a good firearm, offered them $25 more than the city was paying, and picked up some nice bargains. There were rumors that one local gun dealer cleaned out his stocks of junkers that were being cannibalized for parts and sent his employees rotating among the collection points, turning them in two or three at a time.

[Via the Volokh Conspiracy]

· media

Comments

Well, it just seems kind of unsporting to take advantage of the setup like that.

On the serious side, it's your tax dollars, too, paying for the foolishness.

Posted by: Kirk Parker at September 18, 2006 09:24 PM

At the gun shows here in CA, its a felony to buy or sell firearms in the parking lot. Plus how many shiny gold plated mac tens and desert eagles did they "take off the streets"?

Posted by: The Mechanic at September 19, 2006 06:20 PM

While attending the University of Georgia in Athens, I worked for a very large gunshop. The city of Atlanta conducted a buy-back and was paying $50 in cash. My employer drove out there and traded in every Raven .25 auto that we had in stock. (There must have been thirty of them.) Wholesale price for those guns was $27 brand new, and the used ones might have had $15 in them.

Another shop owner was even more creative. He had purchased a bundle of confiscated firearms from the Clayton County Police Department. Half of the guns were broken or missing parts, but he had to buy the whole lot. He took all of the broken and useless guns that he got from the Clayton County PD (paying by the pound) and sold them for $50 each to the city of Atlanta.

The buy-back closed up after the first hour, because they were out of money. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution bragged for days about all the guns that had been "taken off the street."

Posted by: Jeff Bradley at September 19, 2006 06:24 PM

I'm with Kirk - just an abuse/grab of taxpayer money.

Posted by: Mike at September 20, 2006 03:24 PM