Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« British police blogs | Main | Alaska Army command restricts troops' arms »

Pro-gun bills in PA

Posted by David Hardy · 15 March 2006 09:06 AM

Pro-gun legislators in PA have introduced two interesting bills.

One, by Rep. Metcalfe and Pippy, would require destruction of the state background checks after they are passed -- as it is, police are apparently keeping the records. The other, by Rep. Cappelli, would adopt the "castle doctrine," removing the retreat requirement before self-defense (it's hard to tell from the article just how this modifies current PA law -- article refers to protecting homeowners, but at common law the retreat requirement didn't apply in one's own home, as I recall).

Here's another report, referring to Rep. Cappelli and two other unnamed lawmakers.

[Hat tip to Kathy Habel]

· contemporary issues

Comments

I'm glad to hear this as a PA resident, but there's no way Rendell will sign them.

Posted by: Sebastian at March 15, 2006 09:17 AM

PA is a "retreat on the street, but not in your house" state, with all the usual exceptions. (Defense of others, reasonable belief retreat would not be effective, requirement only exists when a retreat in _complete_ safety is possible, etc)

Posted by: geekWithA.45 at March 16, 2006 10:34 AM

Also, the SP spokesman is being disengenious. The State Supreme Court was not as sympathetic to them as his selection of quote implies. They said that the list wasn't a registry as the result of the consequences of how the law was written, and that it would require legislative correction rather than judicial.

Posted by: geekWithA.45 at March 16, 2006 10:37 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)