Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Get an autographed copy of our Heller brief! $7.99 incl. S&H
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« Heads-up for Floridia CCW holders | Main | Schumer's office having trouble with the law »

Nominee Harriet Miers and the Right to Arms

Posted by David Hardy · 3 October 2005 05:47 PM

This time Dave Kopel, over at the Volokh Conspiracy, gets the scoop.

The nominee wrote a 1992 bar journal article referring to liberties that make for a free society, and listed them: "hose precious liberties include free speech, freedom to assemble, freedom of liberties, access to public places, the right to bear arms and freedom from constant surveillance. We are not willing to sacrifice these rights because of the acts of maniacs."

BTW, Michelle Malkin is very much down on the new nominee. The American Thinker makes, to my reading, a good response.

· contemporary issues

Comments

Lifson's take is sycophantic tripe, as far as I'm concerned. I'm supposed to believe Miers is a good nominee because: (1) she won't mind getting doughnuts and drinks for her fellow justices, and because of that they'll all swoon in her presence; and (2) Bush knows small-group dynamics, because he's a Harvard MBA (like Lifson)?

Spare me. The fact that Lifson has to resort to the "coffe 'n' donuts" argument is damning in itself. Bush may have the last laugh on Miers; she may turn out to be another Thomas. But right now there's absolutely no reason to think that will be the case.

The only bright side to this nomination right now is that Miers seems to have a generally sensible view of the right to keep and bear arms.

Posted by: Matt at October 4, 2005 12:57 PM