Of Arms and the Law
Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home
Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography

ISOcover150x200sm.jpg

I've released my documentary film on the history of the right to arms, "In Search of the Second Amendment." It stars twelve professors of constitutional law, plus Steve Halbrook, David Kopel, Don Kates, and Clayton Cramer. You can order the DVD here. And here's the Wikipedia page on it. SUPREME COURT SPECIAL: additional orders only $10 each.


2nd Amendment Discussions
1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Survivalist Blog
The BitchGirls
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Visitors since April 1, 2005: Free Web Counter
Free Hit Counter

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 3.15
Site Design by Sekimori

« A new view of Justice Taney | Main | Mandatory explusion for gun possession at schools »

First use of forensic tests on firearms?

Posted by David Hardy · 11 August 2005 11:02 AM

Just came across a page I'd copied long ago, a Tenn. Supreme Court case from 1842 December Term. (Don't have number of volume, but pp are 290-91, and case is Kirby v. State). Basically, a Ms. Todd was shot at night, through her window. A "very much mashed" rifle ball was found in the room.

"William Daniel proved that the made the bullet moulds for Gideon Anderson's gun, and had in his possession a bullet that was run in those moulds, and by a mark which the moulds make near the neck of the bullet, he knew that the round bullet in his possession, and the mashed bullet found in the house of the deceased, were run in the same mould because they were just alike as to said mark." He also verified the weights were identical. It was proven that Anderson had just sold his rifle to defendant, together with a stock of cast balls.

Shoe marks on ground also matched defendant's shoes, and horse tracks that matched (defendant's mare had a peculiarly shaped hind foot).

The court held that these data, together with defendant's evasive and changing story as to where he was, established guilt.

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)